Tuesday, April 4, 2017

APR 4, 2017 LENR INFO, ONE YEAR LITIGATION

MOTTO

Image result for justice quotesImage result for justice quotes



“The fashion accessories of Justitia, the Roman goddess of justice, express the logic succinctly: (1) scales; (2) blindfold; (3) sword.”   (Steven Pinker)



LENR THINKER

a) What has put Andrea Rossi  and what the IH party in the scales of Justitia?

A year of litigation- the scales of Justitia have  great loads of stuff- facts and assumptions. Facts have weight the assumption not- just now a selection/separation process takes place. 4-5 months and we will have the Verdict.
For the time given, the IH party is making huge efforts to kill the Penon ERV Report.
They want: "Fiat Justitia, pereat technologia!"

b) A very convoluted and overly subtle historical analogy with the RvD litigation

Historical analogies are convoluted, subtle and contradictory;history does unpredictable things- repeats itself, rhymes but also disonates Today see LENR inspiration- I got a very interesting paper about the Wright Brothers - personalities 
that appear in many Cold Fusion metaphors. Now we see that they have focused on patent litigation and have lost their great competitive advantage in the developing of airplanes. The RvD litigation is surely not beneficial for the LENR technology, but 
Andrea Rossi is focusing on progress and is developing a new species of his generators.
The paper  about the Wright Brothers has a fragment strikingly similar to the style and modus operandi of Rossi's enemies. 
Re the Wight Brothers: "Their lack of moderation was equally self-­defeating. Wilbur and Orville thought anyone who did not see things their way was either ignorant or duplicitous; anyone who overtly dis­agreed with them was either a liar or a cheat."
LENR MONITOR

1) From the Miami Court Pacermonitor re the Rossi vs Darden litigation


Monday, April 03, 2017

235
 respm Response in Opposition to Motion Mon 9:36 PM 
RESPONSE in Opposition re215 Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike (Daubert) Motion to Strike and Exclude Defendants' Expert with attached Exhibits filed by Cherokee Investment Partners, LLC, Thomas Darden, IPH International B.V., Industrial Heat, LLC, John T. Vaughn. Replies due by 4/10/2017.(Pace, Christopher)
Att: 1  Exhibit 1,
Att: 2  Exhibit 2,
Att: 3  Exhibit 3,
Att: 4  Exhibit 4,
Att: 5  Exhibit 5,
Att: 6  Exhibit 6,
Att: 7  Exhibit 7,
Att: 8  Exhibit 8,
Att: 9  Exhibit 9,
Att: 10  Exhibit 10,
Att: 11  Exhibit 11,
Att: 12  Exhibit 12,
Att: 13  Exhibit 13,
Att: 14  Exhibit 14,
Att: 15  Exhibit 15

2) Experimental Observations of Nuclear Activity in Deuterated Materials Subjected to a Low-Energy Photon Beam
BM Steinetz, TL Benyo, V Pines, M Pines, LP Forsley…
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20170002584.pdf
Discussed here:
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5191-new-preprint-on-photo-induced-nuclear-effects/?postID=54556#post54556

3) Trump Protects Coal, Tesla Powers Hawaiian Island
http://coldfusion3.com/blog/trump-protects-coal-tesla-powers-hawaiian-island
Discussed at:

4) Cold fusion. When the system doesn't want you independent and autonomous

La fusione fredda: Quando il sistema non vi vuole indipendenti e autonomihttp://lamiaparteintollerante.altervista.org/la-fusione-fredda-quando-il-sistema-non-vi-vuole-indipendenti-e-autonomi/

5) From Andrea Rossi's JONP

Jane
April 3, 2017 at 5:50 PM

Dr Andrea Rossi,
New important replications have been made by Dr Parkhomov, are you aware of them?

Andrea Rossi
April 4, 2017 at 7:46 AM

Jane:
Yes: very interesting.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

According to Ing. Michelangelo de Meo this is the official website-channel of Professor Alexandr Parkhomov
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMvQyFS0kkIvIteH0DO43yg
MORE INFORMATION ABOUT PARKHOMOV ON JONP TODAY!


Mark
April 4, 2017 at 10:36 AM

Dr Andrea Rossi:
1- was JMC directed by you?
2- did IH- Darden know who was the director of JMP?
3- was the owner of JMC directly or indirectly a relative of yours?
4- did IH- Darden ever complain about the owner or the director of JMP before or during the performance test?
5- did you ever say or write that JMP was owned by Johnson Matthey?
6- did ever Darden-IH ask you who was the owner of JMP during the validation test?
7- did Darden use JMP for his promotion, knowing who was the director of it?
8- why Darden-IH have not been able to enter in the JMP area where the plant of JMP was installed?
Since these issues have been already disclosed in the documents published by the Court, can you answer?
Regards,
Mark
Andrea Rossi
April 4, 2017 at 1:37 PM

Mark:
Evidence in documents speaks for itself and says:
1- yes
2- yes, since 2014
3- no
4- never
5- never
6- never
7- yes, he demanded Jim Bass to give good reference to his investors
8- because the agreement between JMP and IH vetoed to IH to enter the area of JMP and vice versa
Warm Regards,
A.R.

5) In Russian
The expert report of Fzbio Penon about the test of the Andrea Rossi's plant
  Отчет эксперта Ф.Пенона о годичных испытаниях установки Андреа Росси
http://www.proatom.ru/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=7404



LENR INSPIRATION


THE WRIGHT BROTHERS BECOME ANACHRONISMS 

3 comments:

  1. Comment from ECat World.

    Discussion on E-Cat World 65 comments
    MFMP Invites Crowd Engagement for Developi…
    doug marker
    doug marker sam 4 hours ago
    And that is not unreasonable an approach. What we do know of LENR & even Mills theories, is that few people in the world can claim to be expert on all or even most aspects of the technology processes and more so the theories. It is near impossible for businesses (let alone us) to choose confidently based on proof of theories because they just aren't in place.
    So for these revolutionary new energy advances we speak of, businesses and interested organisations can only really get involved based on observation and testing the devices and deciding they can manufacture and sell them.
    And, in the case of new energy, there are massive interests (both financial and political) that are directly opposed to any sudden shift away from oil as an instrument of foreign policy that they are not part of.
    Then there are the investors who have a vested interest in locking up any and all IP they can get their hands on. This happened in the IT / Computer industry - particular companies actively went to war in the 1990s & into the 2000s, seeking to secure all patents & IP they could and began a round of lawsuits and also sabotage. Back around 2002, Sun Microsystems was awarded a $3 billion US dept of justice settlement against Microsoft who had deliberately set out to corrupt the Java browser Sun had licensed to Microsoft.
    http://www.techlawjournal.c...
    Also in the 2000s IBM was sued for $2+ Billion by a company (Caldera Inc but later renamed TheSCOGroup) claiming that the operating system called Linux was stolen from 'their' Unix O/S and IBM was responsible. That case was thrown out when it was proved the renamed TheSCOGroup company didn't own Unix. Unix was shown to be really owned by a company called Novell who had bought the real SCO and sold parts (but not Unix) to Caldera Inc). These cases were fought for Billions of dollars. Energy wars are likely to be fought for Trillions of $s.
    https://arstechnica.com/tec...
    Back to new energy. There is no real point in wheeling along journalists to early demos as no one who matters will listen. Only when people can see something working will we make any progress, but then the energy wars will begin. Do not imagine for an instant that there will or could be a happy glorious transition to a world of near free energy, without blood and guts on the floor.
    Doug Marker
    Sydney Australia
    1 Reply View

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am not sure the place you are getting your information, however good topic.I needs to spend some time studying more or understanding more.Thank you for wonderful information I was in search of this info for my mission.

    Manpower Consultancy in Bangalore
    HR Consultancy in Bangalore
    Recruitment Consultancy in Bangalore
    HR Franchise in Bangalore

    ReplyDelete
  3. Regarding point 5 above;-
    There are a few more questions I would have liked to see added to that list.

    3a- Was the owner of JMC directly or indirectly an agent or associate of yours?

    3b- Was the owner of JMC a company in the UK as stated or strongly inferred by statements on the Rossiblog?

    3c- Were there ever any statements made on the Rossiblog which suggested or implied that JMP was a totally independent entity, incorporated in the UK which would use 1MW of steam energy to manufacture real products?

    8a- Why was there any need to exclude IH from the JMP area of the building when it is now stated that IH knew you were a director of JMP and therefore knew exactly what was happening in that area, and therefore knew that there were so manufacturing processes and IP secrets in there to be divulged or spied on by anyone?

    Actually, there are just so many questions regarding this whole supposed performance test which crop up every time a new deposition is made.
    From the depositions, it is now apparent that what was originally assumed to be an independent customer performing a highly energy intensive and top secret manufacturing process producing real products was nothing more than a 'smoke and mirrors' performance to dissipate a small amount of heat out through a ceiling vent and producing nothing but a 12 month delay.

    Was there any real independent 'customer'?
    Was any real product produced?
    Was there ever 1 megawatt of power dissipated anywhere in that building?
    All information now strongly suggests, no, no and no.

    Even the argument that the involvement of Penon as a guarantee that everything was being closely and constantly supervised and verified has now been shown to be false. Is it true he was rarely there and got most of his data by way of methods other than his direct measurement and acquisition?
    If so, of what value is his report other than it confirms the intention of whoever supplied the data, be it Rossi or an agent of Rossi?
    On that basis his report is completely worthless as an independent assessment of its performance.
    That being the case, why would anyone pay out money on the strength of it?

    ReplyDelete